White-Label Embedded Finance: Hype or Hyper-Growth?
Embedded finance is the buzzword du jour, promising to seamlessly integrate financial products into, well, everything. And white-labeling β embedding someone else's financial capabilities under your brand β is touted as the key to unlocking this potential. The promise is seductive: speed, scalability, brand control, and, of course, customer loyalty. But as a former hedge fund data analyst, I've learned to approach such claims with a healthy dose of skepticism. Let's dissect the numbers, shall we?
The core idea is sound. Companies, particularly Vertical SaaS (vSaaS) platforms, are increasingly embedding financial services directly into their workflows. Think of a construction management platform offering instant financing for materials, or a healthcare software facilitating patient payment plans. The appeal is obvious: increased customer retention and new revenue streams for the platform, and frictionless access to financial services for the end-user. Data suggests 75% of small businesses are open to this, but how many actually use it?
The rise of APIs, cloud computing, and open banking provides the infrastructure, but the real question is: who benefits most? The vSaaS platforms are sitting on a goldmine of live transaction data, giving them an unprecedented contextual understanding of their customers' financial needs. This, in turn, enables personalized financial services, eliminating traditional banking barriers. Over 98% of businesses that apply for pre-approved offers from vSaaS platforms receive them. That sounds great, but what are the terms of those offers? Are they genuinely beneficial, or just cleverly disguised predatory lending? (This is the part of the report that I find genuinely puzzling.) According to a Boston Consulting Group article, moving Moving Embedded Finance from Promise to Practice - Boston Consulting Group from promise to practice requires careful consideration of risks and rewards.
There's a dark side to this seamlessness: fraud. In 2024, a staggering 79% of organizations experienced payments fraud. And fraud, it seems, is growing as fast as the B2B market itself. The shift to remote and hybrid work has decentralized payment operations, expanding the attack surface. Check fraud, that relic of the past, remains rampant in sectors like construction, healthcare, and government.
White-label solutions promise advanced security, compliance, and visibility into the payment process. WEX and Trulioo partnered to integrate document verification and biometrics, which is a step in the right direction. But security is a cat-and-mouse game. As security measures become more sophisticated, so do the fraudsters.

The sales pitch emphasizes customer loyalty, citing that 72% of B2B buyers are more loyal to suppliers offering their preferred payment methods. But what if their preferred method is also the most vulnerable to fraud? And let's be honest, "preferred" often translates to "most convenient," even if it's not the most secure. 90% of payment executives experienced friction in paying suppliers in the past year. Friction, in the context of security, is often a good thing. It forces a moment of pause, a chance to verify.
The marketing materials also emphasize simplified processes (20% prioritized) and enhanced security features (13% favored) when choosing payment options with suppliers. But simplified and secure? That's a tough balance to strike. It's like trying to build a car that's both incredibly fast and incredibly safe. You can achieve both, but it requires a lot of engineering and a hefty price tag.
The total addressable market (TAM) for embedded finance in North America and Europe is about $185 billion. But current penetration is around $32 billion. That leaves more than 80% of the market still up for grabs. This is where the "hyper-growth" narrative comes from.
However, only a single-digit percentage of merchants consistently use software finance products such as cash advances. Small businesses in America are responsible for more than 40% of GDP but get less than 4% of capital lent out by large banks. There's a clear disconnect here. The opportunity is massive, but adoption remains stubbornly low. Why?
Is it a lack of awareness? A lack of trust? Or is it simply that the existing solutions aren't meeting the needs of small businesses? I suspect it's a combination of all three. The white-label approach can address the trust issue by allowing businesses to offer financial services under their own brand. But it's crucial to partner strategically, prioritize visibility and control through dashboards, and invest in loyalty-driving payments.
SaaS providers offering integrated payments solutions accounted for 36% of SME acquiring revenues last year, and are expected to expand their share to 45% by 2028. Growth was about 30%βto be more exact, 28.6%. That's significant, but it's still a far cry from "hyper-growth."
White-label embedded finance isn't a magic bullet. It's a tool, and like any tool, it can be used effectively or ineffectively. The key is to focus on the numbers, to understand the risks, and to avoid getting swept up in the hype. The potential is there, no doubt. But realizing that potential requires a clear-eyed assessment of the challenges and a commitment to building secure, transparent, and truly beneficial solutions.