Okay, let's dive right into this. The Select Committee on China just dropped a report, and the headlines are screaming about a "dirty secret": American and allied companies are, allegedly, fueling China's semiconductor ambitions. We're talking about companies like ASML, Tokyo Electron, Applied Materials, KLA, and Lam Research. The accusation? They're selling critical equipment to Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs), some with military ties.
Now, on the surface, this looks bad. Chairman Moolenaar is saying these companies are prioritizing profits over U.S. national security. Ranking Member Krishnamoorthi is questioning why we're handing China the tools to modernize their military and, frankly, violate human rights. It sounds dire, and I get it. It is concerning. But here's where I think we need to shift our perspective.
This isn't just about companies chasing profits; it's about a fundamental reality of global economics. China is the largest market for semiconductor manufacturing equipment. Slapping export controls on everything might feel good in the short term, but it also creates a vacuum. And nature, as they say, abhors a vacuum.
The report highlights that Dutch and Japanese firms have increased revenues from PRC entities as the U.S. imposed controls. Did we really think China would just sit idly by? Of course not! This is a nation determined to achieve technological self-sufficiency, and they're playing the long game. The CCP is reportedly stockpiling lithography equipment at sophistication levels just below current restrictions. It's like trying to stop a flood with a sandbag – you might slow it down, but you're not changing the underlying force. What are the geopolitical implications of these companies' dependence on revenue from China?
This situation is not unlike when Gutenberg invented the printing press. The church tried to suppress it, fearing the spread of information. But did that stop the Reformation? No way. It fueled it. Now, I'm not saying China's ambitions are analogous to the Reformation, but the underlying principle is the same: trying to stifle technological progress ultimately backfires.
Instead of panicking and erecting more barriers, we need to see this as a wake-up call. A catalyst for our innovation.
What if, instead of just restricting exports, we doubled down on investing in domestic semiconductor manufacturing? What if we created incentives for companies to bring their supply chains back home? What if we fostered a collaborative ecosystem of research and development that made the U.S. the undisputed leader in semiconductor technology?
That's the opportunity here. The Select Committee's findings, while alarming, can be the spark that ignites a new era of American ingenuity.
I saw a comment on Reddit that really resonated with me. Someone wrote, "Instead of complaining about China's progress, let's focus on making sure we're running even faster." That's the spirit!
Of course, there's a serious ethical dimension to all of this. We can't ignore the human rights concerns or the potential for military applications. But the answer isn't simply to cut off China. It's to ensure that our technology is used for good, to promote democracy, and to uphold human rights. It's a balancing act, for sure, but one we must navigate with wisdom and courage.
The investigation recommends aligning allied export controls with U.S. restrictions, expanding country-wide controls for the PRC, widening the list of restricted entities, restricting the export of components important to SME production, creating a whistleblower export control program, and increasing resources for BIS and the State Department. These are all important steps. But they're not enough. New Investigation Reveals American and Allied Companies Boosted the CCP's Semiconductor Industry, Fueled the PRC's Military Ambitions and Human Rights Abuses - Select Committee on the CCP | (.gov)
We need a comprehensive strategy that addresses the root causes of our dependence on foreign supply chains. We need to invest in education, infrastructure, and research. We need to create a business environment that attracts the best and brightest minds from around the world.
This isn't just about semiconductors; it's about the future of American innovation. It's about ensuring that we remain the global leader in technology for generations to come. It's about creating a world where technology empowers humanity, rather than threatening it.
When I first read this report, I honestly felt a wave of disappointment, even anger. But then, I stepped back and saw the bigger picture. This isn't a setback; it's an opportunity. It's a chance to reimagine our role in the world, to reaffirm our commitment to innovation, and to build a future where technology serves humanity.
ONON Stock: Unpacking the Future Potential
2025-11-13